A Tearful Interlude at Our Local Caucus

12 02 2008

We went to our democratic caucus Saturday. Here in Washington, for whatever reason, the Democrats choose to have 100% of their delegates chosen by caucus. Whether or not that disenfranchises voters is under debate (it does) but last weekends caucus’ were blessed with record turnout, as everyone with an ear to the news knows. I think there are two reasons for this (or rather three, if you prefer this sort of numbering),1. strong candidates that give followers a reason for enthusiasm and 2. the beautiful vista of a White House free of George W. Bush.

So, in our house, there is a buzz of excitement (when my husband and I have enough energy to buzz, sleep is still a premium) over the elections, despite the fact that, this year, they are drawn out and excessively expensive (it seems best not to think of the money trickling down the drain as though the faucet were leaking). Filled with more enthusiasm than we usually muster for community activities (Willie and I are hopelessly uncomfortable with community)we tramped up (or rather drove, as we were running late as usual) the hill to the school, Willie the kids and I. The kids were somewhat less enthusiastic than we were—they had been having fun and did not want to leave the house. But leave we did, and we arrived at our son’s school where the first thing we saw was a line starting to circle around the building. Our neighbors across the street with the adorable little white dog were there (sans dog) and so was the man in the little hat that Willie had noticed driving in the car in front of us with the bumpersticker if you aren’t appalled then you aren’t paying attention. We also saw some entrepreneurial individuals selling hot chocolate and hot apple cider at a stand pasted with Hillary Clinton ephemera.

Inside, there was general confusion as people tried to figure out their precinct number and find the location within the school that housed the table holding the sheets upon which we could sign in and state the candidate we supported. Then we milled a bit until a DNC official took the mic and tried to get us to quiet down and say the pledge and listen to instructions.
And here is the weird part. Sort of the point of this piece—it has taken me awhile to get here and you might notice I am being slow about telling you, even now. But, to my surprise and embarrassment (although nobody noticed, not even Willie, who, when I told him later, made fun of me, ha ha) I started to tear up, at the pledge, at the enormous turnout at the sight of friends and neighbors, at the sight of my children. Democracy in action I told myself, grasping onto a bit of pablum to put feelings into words (however inaccurate). My tears dried quickly and I spent the rest of the time dry eyed, leaving early because the children had had it and anyway, I wasn’t changing my candidate even if the other side had beautifully crafted and elegantly formed talking points (which, as a friend told me later, they didn’t).

Willie and I went over the caucus at home, especially the fact that they ran out of the official forms for filling out candidate preference despite knowing that all other caucuses had had record turnouts, and the closeness of the delegate count between the candidates was likely to lead to a record turnout in Washington. They had also run out of name tag stickers early on and Willie was overjoyed to see people with their names scrawled on tape that was placed across their chests. Willie was disappointed Mike Gravel had no support as he has a secret desire for a Gravel/Rumsfeld ticket—one he guarantees will bring real change.

Willie was surprised when I told him I teared up—delighted as well since it gave him fodder for amusing little sallies into humor at my expense. I, however, keep thinking about my tearing up—democracy in action? But the caucuses were decidedly not that. According to one estimate 1 million fewer people attend the caucuses than vote in primaries in Washington. The caucuses restrict a political voice to people who can make it midday on Saturday (those that do not work, do not have to tend ailing relatives, that can bring their children, that are not ailing themselves). I do not think my reaction was to democracy in action.

Instead, I think my reaction is a symptom of the lifting of the psychological trauma that the Bush administration as been for me. Because it has truly been a traumatic eight years, not just for myself, but for millions of us who believe our eyes have been opened to the truly weak foundation upon which our perceived freedom rests. We learned our votes were not safe, that fear and lies could constrict the power of government to a few power hungry people so lacking in vision that they have been willing to trade our peace, our economic security, our standing in the world, our honor, and our land earth seas and skies for a pitiful handful of coins. We have learned what we predicted would be bad is only that much worse, that what we thought would be unfortunate would be horrible. We have learned that we have little power to protect our children’s future if the machine in the White House decides to run over them. We have also learned that our only strength is a local strength. And if we are lucky we will find out and make circles of safety in our own small regions, battling against a national trend in the other direction.

It was an interesting sensation to recognize this—that the certain end of the Bush administration (at least if you do not believe the murmur that something will happen to allow him to suspend the election because of a state of emergency) is something akin to the lifting of trauma. He will be gone and someone else will inherit the wreckage of a country that he and his government leave in their wake. Does it matter who? Yes, it matters a great deal. More than I realized before these years of W. I hope, however, it does not matter as much as it did with Bush. Because psychologically I cannot take another four, eight, twelve years of the sort of political machinations the Bush Administration has engaged in. Even with the support of the Daily Show and Colbert, I will not be able to take it. And this was the other thing that made me tear up. I am not the only one—all of us will need a period of recovery, a time to take care of ourselves and our little patch of earth—we’ll need Jon Stewart and Colbert, Doonsbury and Rumsfeld’s words written down as poetic pieces of nonsense to cleanse ourselves of these past eight horrible years.




One response

13 02 2008

Hello, jdcalkins2001. Thanks for this great post; thanks for figuring out and then verbalizing what so many of us are feeling about the 8 years of being Bushwacked. I think you got it just right.

Our caucus was completely chaotic, loud, and great fun. I love how archaic and inefficient the system is because that way it seems more closely linked to the past, meaning the early days of our democracy, and because it’s about people when so much of our daily lives have become about technology.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s